Unexpected color cast in print

June 15, 2017  •  26 Comments

Recently, I thought it would be a good idea to create a "test strip" in the margin of one of my photographs.  Here's how to do it:

First, create a white border around your image.  There are several ways to do this, but I use a simple procedure.  Resize the image so as to leave room for the border.  For example, for an 8.5 x 11 print, resize to 7.5 x 10.  Note that you don't want to just crop it to that size.  Use Image > Image Size to actually change the size.  Ensure that your foreground color is black and your background is white.  Then choose Image > Canvas Size and specify the actual paper size (e.g. 8.5 x 11).  Anchor the canvas in the middle, and specify Background for the canvas extension color.  (If the canvas extension color setting is grayed out so that you can't change it, create a new target layer to work on: Control + Shift + Alt + E.)

Next, use the rectangular marquee tool to create a rectangle along the bottom border.  (You can use one of the other borders, with appropriate modifications to the following instructions.)  Now, create a new Gradient adjustment layer.  Make sure the gradient is Foreground to Background, and set the angle to 0 degrees.

Then, create a Posterize adjustment layer, and select between 6 and 10 Levels.  Be sure to select Layer > Create Clipping Mask to limit the posterization to the Gradient Fill layer.  Now select the Gradient Fill layer and double click on it, bringing up the Layer Style menu.  In that menu, select Stroke, and specify a size of about 10 pixels, a fill color of black and a normal blend mode.

With my homemade test strip in the border of my image, I was ready to print.  I have calibrated my monitor.  I am using Epson paper in an Epson printer with the corresponding Epson-supplied profile.  So I was shocked when the test strip on my print was not white, gray and black but variations of a warm brown.  It certainly didn't look brown on my monitor.  In fact, as I moved the cursor from the left of my test strip to the right, the RGB values shown in Photoshop's Info panel when from 0/0/0 to 255/255/255.  Intermediate values were all perfectly balanced grays (e.g. 113/113/113).  I concluded that there must be a problem with the printer or the paper.  Maybe the paper was too old.  I guessed I'd have to buy one of those expensive colorimeters and make my own profiles.  

Meanwhile, I had been ignoring the flashing ink light on my printer.  From long experience, I'd learned that the flashing light meant it was time to by a new cartridge to be prepared when the current one was empty.  I nearly always have new cartridges on hand, so that wasn't a problem.  I knew that when any of the cartridges was actually empty, the ink light would come on solid, and the printer would stop printing.  I've even changed ink cartridges in the middle of a print and couldn't detect the point in the print where it had stopped to wait for me to make the change.  So, I continued to experiment with photo filters, fill layers and other techniques to try to compensate for the brown cast.  The results were mediocre at best.

Then yesterday, the ink light came on solid.  I changed out the cyan cartridge for a new one and proceeded to print a new image, one that I had not added any compensating fill layers or photo filters to, but on which I had created the requisite test strip.  I was expecting to see a brown cast in the test strip and then begin experimenting over again to get rid of it.  To my surprise, the test strip came out black, gray and white without a hint of color cast.  The print looked great!  It then finally dawned on me that the "brown" cast was probably due to a lack of cyan, and that, the result of a nearly empty cartridge, the cyan color had not been applied sufficiently.

The lesson?  No, I'm not going to start changing cartridges as soon as the ink light blinks.  But when the ink light is blinking, I will create test strips to help look for a color cast.  If one shows up, I will change the cartridge before it is completely empty.  What I pay for changing cartridges sooner will be more than compensated for by the time and paper I save.

 

 


Comments

Justin(non-registered)
Protocol Revenue Versus Creator Earnings
========================================

Start with the basics

Protocol Revenue Versus Creator Earnings is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on why money received by an application is not identical to a creator reward. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonk xyz or stonk xyz platform, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.

To understand protocol revenue versus creator earnings, begin with why money received by an application is not identical to a creator reward. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. Buybacks and burns are sometimes described as a flywheel, but that metaphor should not hide the moving pieces. One needs to know which fee streams are eligible, which transactions actually occurred, which tokens were purchased, and whether burned supply can be independently verified.

No single metric is sufficient for a new onchain token. Price, nominal market value, the number of swaps, wallet distribution and depth of available liquidity can tell different stories. Reading them together does not remove uncertainty, but it can reveal weaknesses that disappear in a one-number summary.

Why the detail matters

One practical way to approach this subject is to examine fees paid to creators depend on actual activity and distribution rules. The difference matters because two similar-looking charts can represent very different risks. An onchain ledger makes it possible to inspect transactions, but the interpretation still matters. Dashboards may differ in definitions, asset pricing, indexing coverage and the treatment of recipient payouts. A credible analysis explains these limitations before making comparisons.

The surrounding Solana environment also affects why money received by an application is not identical to a creator reward. Network transaction fees, execution routes, the behavior of the quote asset and pool depth may all influence the result a wallet user experiences. Even when the application interface makes the process feel simple, the transaction remains part of an open and sometimes volatile market.

Risks and limitations

An often overlooked aspect is a popular launch can still deliver inconsistent creator income. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. Revenue terminology needs discipline. Trading volume is the notional amount exchanged; fees are charges associated with that activity; protocol revenue is the part attributed to the platform under a particular accounting method. Creator earnings and holder distributions may be additional, distinct categories.

Putting it together

For a grounded assessment, Fees paid to creators depend on actual activity and distribution rules. At the same time, a popular launch can still deliver inconsistent creator income. A search for stonkfun coins may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
Uta(non-registered)
Reading Supply Figures for a StonkFun Coin
==========================================

Start with the basics

Reading Supply Figures for a StonkFun Coin is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on why fixed supply does not mean a token price will be stable. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonk xyz platform or stonkfun coins, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.

To understand reading supply figures for a stonkfun coin, begin with why fixed supply does not mean a token price will be stable. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. Quote-token volatility adds a second layer to the analysis. If a new coin is paired with an asset whose own dollar price changes, its dollar-denominated chart can move for reasons unrelated to new demand for that coin. This is why the denominator of a displayed price should never be ignored.

Why the detail matters

One practical way to approach this subject is to examine supply, liquidity and demand are different variables. The difference matters because two similar-looking charts can represent very different risks. Burning tokens refers to removing units from usable circulation according to the relevant mechanism. A burn is observable supply-side activity, not a promise that demand will rise. Market outcomes also depend on liquidity, sentiment, competition and broader crypto conditions.

Risks and limitations

An often overlooked aspect is market capitalization can be misleading when liquidity is very thin. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. Coins created by independent users should be evaluated individually. Sharing a launch venue does not mean sharing the same team, contract settings, liquidity depth or risk profile. A platform token, meanwhile, has a different narrative and should not be conflated with every coin appearing in the discovery feed.

Putting it together

For a grounded assessment, Supply, liquidity and demand are different variables. At the same time, market capitalization can be misleading when liquidity is very thin. A search for stonk dot fun may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
상품권신용카드(non-registered)
상품권 구매를 계획할 때는 이용 가능한 결제 수단과 수수료, 사용 조건을 미리 확인하는 것이 중요합니다. 상품권소액결제 관련 정보를 꼼꼼히 비교하면 예산을 관리하고 자신에게 맞는 방법을 선택하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
유흥알바(non-registered)
근무지를 선택할 때는 이동 거리와 교통편도 중요한 기준이 됩니다. 룸알바 구직 정보를 확인하면서 대중교통 이용 가능 여부와 귀가 방법을 미리 살펴보면 보다 현실적인 계획을 세울 수 있습니다.
Erna(non-registered)
Парктроник передний
Система «старт-стоп»
Усилитель руля
Электропривод зеркал
Электропривод крышки багажника
Электроскладывание зеркал
Электростеклоподъёмники задние
No comments posted.
Loading...

Archive
January February March April May June July August September October (1) November December (1)
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February (1) March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June (1) July (2) August (1) September (1) October November December
January February March (1) April May (1) June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September (1) October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December